It's my pleasure that i can provide this patch. Would you mind giving me some related resources（like web links） to get advanced touch to custom namespaces?
I know that there are two custom NamespaceHandler in karaf which depend on geronimo implementation as following: "public class NamespaceHandler implements org.apache.geronimo.blueprint.NamespaceHandler" Do you mean that i provide a neutral implementation of custom NamespaceHandler which depends neither georinimo or springDM? It is seems to need a serial of neutral class like MetaBean? Another problem is how to register the new custom NamespaceHanler? Now it is registered in blueprint configuration xml file which is recognized by geronimo BP implementation. Give me some help! thanks! On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > So I've had a closer look at what would be required. > The problem right now is that karaf defines two custom namespaces but > custom > namespaces aren't standardized by the blueprint spec yet (it's being worked > on though). > In the meantime, we could support both spring-dm and aries blueprint > implementation (former geronimo blueprint implementation) by providing two > implementations of the same namespace. > I think there would be one remaining thing to do which is to provide a > neutral way to access the ConfigAdmin and properties placeholders, which > basically mean rewriting those namespaces (it should mostly be some > repackaging thingy as both aries and spring-dm support almost the same > features). This way, we could switch easily between spring-dm and aries. > If you're willing to go that way and provide some patches, i'd be happy to > help. > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 15:03, Tribon Cheng <[email protected]> wrote: > > > thank you for your answer, Guillaume. > > Do you mean that i modify the blueprint configuration xml file contained > in > > karaf-jaas.jar and karaf-shell.jar, > > and use spring-dm specific features instead? > > In this way I can remove the geronimo blueprint bundle from karaf, it's > > right? > > thanks a lot! > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Karaf works well with Spring-DM 1.2.x afaik. > > > If you really need to use 2.0.x, i suppose it should be possible by > > > modifying the blueprint xml to use spring-dm specific features instead > of > > > the geronimo ones. > > > Though, it should be possible to have two blueprint extenders under > > certain > > > conditions, so we should try to support that if possible. > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:06, Tribon Cheng <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > I just want to find a OSGI runtime framework which can provide well > > > > management, hot deploy, log config and so on. > > > > > > > > So karaf is a good candidate. But for the blueprint implement, I'd > > perfer > > > > to > > > > choose SpringDM to obtain more features of Spring. > > > > > > > > The problem is that karaf contains the geronimal blueprint > > implementation > > > > and Karaf-Shell,Karaf-JAAS have strong* dependencies * > > > > ** > > > > *on it, if i install another blueprint implementation like SpringDm, > > the > > > > blueprint config file will be parsed twice, once by* > > > > ** > > > > *geronimal and the other by springdm.* > > > > ** > > > > *can someone give me some suggestions, thanks a lot.* > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Contribute to Enterprise Integration > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers, > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > ------------------------ > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > ------------------------ > > > Open Source SOA > > > http://fusesource.com > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Contribute to Enterprise Integration > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com > -- Contribute to Enterprise Integration
