Richard, Guo, Thanks for the reply. The Felix version is 2.0.4.
I'm not perfectly familiar with fragments yet so it may be a design mistake anyway. This fragment bundle contains some common JAR libraries we plan to import into multiple bundles so we don't have to add them to each of our bundles. So we created a fragment bundle, added the JARs to the bundle classpath and exported them as you can see in the manifest. Is this the right way to do this? What should be the host bundle in this case? Richard S. Hall wrote: > > The above is a system bundle framework extension, which automatically > gets attached to the system bundle when it is installed; this is why you > see if get resolved immediately. However, the fact that it is attached > to nothing is sort of a missed special case since system bundle > extensions are handled differently than normal fragments. This message > should be improved in the framework. > > If you are trying to create a fragment for SampleClient, you should have > something like this in the fragment metadata: > > Fragment-Host: <symbolic-name-of-sample-client> > > This will cause the fragment to get attached to SampleClient, rather > than the system bundle. > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Fragment-bundle-does-not-get-attached-tp28265468p28270107.html Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org
