No, I didn't should I? 2010/10/8 Karl Pauls <[email protected]>
> Did you install the policy bundle from the example as well? > > regards, > > Karl > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I found a link to [1]. And tried like in the example to use a > > security.policy file. That didn't seem to work. > > Another thing that really didn't seem to be right was, that the security > > bundle wasn't listed as a fragment attached to the framework bundle (If I > > use equinox as the framework bundle it was listed). > > > > Is there some sort of documentation besides the rather spare wiki > > documentation? > > > > > > [1] > > > http://osgi-in-action.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/chapter14/combined-example/ > > > > > > > > 2010/10/8 Karl Pauls <[email protected]> > > > >> how are you trying to use the DENY or ALLOW syntax? > >> > >> regards, > >> > >> Karl > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > I now tried two ways of configuring security within the karaf server. > One > >> > taking equinox, after setting the right properties and the policy file > it > >> > did work. With Felix I think I do have an issue, I used the latest > Karaf > >> > version from SVN with Felix 3.0.3 and added the security bundle. If I > >> list > >> > the available bundles I do see that the security bundle is resolved > but > >> > shouldn't the framework-bundle (felix in this case) import the > security > >> > bundle as a fragment? Because this didn't work and a refresh on bundle > 0 > >> > causes the Karaf to crash :( > >> > Still I do get the security to work but I'm not able to use the DENY > or > >> > ALLOW syntax. BTW. is there some documentation about the security > bundle > >> > available I just found some hints in older mailing threads. > >> > Right now I have to configure every Security Constraint I wan't to > enable > >> > just to skip this one java.security.Runtime exitVM :( > >> > > >> > > >> > 2010/10/4 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> > >> > > >> >> The karaf shutdown does not call system.exit(), it > >> >> calls getBundleContext().getBundle(0).stop() which is way cleaner in > >> osgi. > >> >> The system.exit() is only called by the Main class that launches the > >> >> framework, so if permissions are configured on bundles, it should be > ok, > >> >> since the launcher is outside the osgi framework. > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 15:06, Achim Nierbeck < > [email protected] > >> >> >wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Hi, thanks for the first answer, you are right I don't have a lot > of > >> osgi > >> >> > security knowledge. > >> >> > One thing though that crosses my mind about your first solution. If > I > >> use > >> >> > the apache Karaf as runtime container how would this affect the > >> >> "shutdown" > >> >> > command of the console? > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks, Achim > >> >> > > >> >> > 2010/10/4 Karl Pauls <[email protected]> > >> >> > > >> >> > > I guess there are several ways to do this but the most portable > one > >> >> > > should be to start with security enabled (and in felix case - the > >> >> > > framework.security bundle installed). From there, you could > specify > >> a > >> >> > > policy that gives allpermission but has a deny on System.Exit. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Assuming you don't have a lot of osgi security knowledge I can > try > >> to > >> >> > > write a more detailed mail about how to do this tonight... > >> >> > > > >> >> > > regards, > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Karl > >> >> > > > >> >> > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Achim Nierbeck < > >> >> [email protected] > >> >> > > > >> >> > > wrote: > >> >> > > > Hi, > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > I asked this question in the karaf user mailing list but they > told > >> me > >> >> > > this > >> >> > > > would be the better place to ask :) > >> >> > > > I have a special Problem I would like to solve with the > >> >> SecurityManger. > >> >> > > But > >> >> > > > first the Problem I'm facing: > >> >> > > > I have a bundle containing a third party legacy library I have > to > >> >> use. > >> >> > > > This Library does call system.Exit(?) if it looses it's > connection > >> to > >> >> a > >> >> > > > corresponding server. > >> >> > > > I know that this is really bad (actually mean) but the quickest > >> way > >> >> of > >> >> > > > shipping around this problem is using a service wrapper which > does > >> a > >> >> > > > restart. > >> >> > > > But this is not a nice way of doing especially this system.exit > >> >> forces > >> >> > a > >> >> > > > hard shutdown :( > >> >> > > > So I googled around and found that there is one solution for > this, > >> >> use > >> >> > a > >> >> > > > security manager which disallows System.Exit. > >> >> > > > Now the tricky part, how do I specify a securityManager just > for > >> this > >> >> > > bundle > >> >> > > > preventing it from using System.Exit? > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Thank you in Advance :) > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > -- > >> >> > > Karl Pauls > >> >> > > [email protected] > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> Guillaume Nodet > >> >> ------------------------ > >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > >> >> ------------------------ > >> >> Open Source SOA > >> >> http://fusesource.com > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Karl Pauls > >> [email protected] > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > Karl Pauls > [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
