OK - thanks Clement!

/Bengt

2010/10/26 Clement Escoffier <[email protected]>

>
> On 26.10.2010, at 10:57, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
>
> > Since iPOJO 1.6.6 has been released, don't we require a 1.6.6 version of
> the
> > manipulator as well. As I understood it it is important that the
> manipulator
> > version matches the iPOJO version. I use the maven-ipojo-plugin with the
> > dependency to the manipulator version to used, as follows:
> >
> > <plugin>
> >        <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
> >        <artifactId>maven-ipojo-plugin</artifactId>
> >        <executions>
> >          <execution>
> >            <goals>
> >              <goal>ipojo-bundle</goal>
> >            </goals>
> >            <configuration>
> >              <metadata>ipojo-metadata.xml</metadata>
> >            </configuration>
> >          </execution>
> >        </executions>
> >        <dependencies>
> >          <dependency>
> >            <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
> >            <artifactId>org.apache.felix.ipojo.manipulator</artifactId>
> >            <version>${ipojo-manipulator-version}</version>
> >          </dependency>
> >        </dependencies>
> >      </plugin>
> >
> > What manipulator version should I use if I use iPOJO 1.6.6?
>
> No, it's two different components. Sometimes, manipulator changes break the
> core and in this case I generally do a full release of iPOJO (1.8.0). But
> the recents changes of the iPOJO Core does not require a new manipulator.
>
> Regards,
>
> Clement
>
> >
> > /Bengt
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to