Ah, perfect. Thanks for your help. Justin
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Donald Whytock <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay. If you have access to the framework, you can use > bundlecontext.getBundle(0).stop(); that should shut down the > framework. > > Don > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Justin Stoecker <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi Don, >> >> It's not *absolutely* necessary. The statistics bundle actually >> depends on other bundles, all of which I could use directly, but it >> would be desirable and/or interesting for learning purposes. >> >> Justin >> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Donald Whytock <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Do you absolutely need the statistics bundle to run in a Felix >>> framework? Or could you just include the bundle's .jar on your >>> classpath, instantiate the service object and run the method directly? >>> >>> Don >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Justin Stoecker <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have a "statistics" bundle that provides the service of reading a >>>> file, doing some calculations, and writing a new file. Ideally, I >>>> would like to write a small command-line program inside an executable >>>> JAR (not a bundle) that would be used as follows: >>>> >>>> java -jar analyzer.jar file1 file2 file3 ... >>>> >>>> The host program in analyzer.jar would then launch an embedded >>>> framework, auto-deploy the statistics bundle, and use the service >>>> interface of that bundle. I read on the felix website that there are >>>> two options for this type of situation: having the service interfaces >>>> inside the host program (not something I want to do, as these bundles >>>> should not depend on this host program) or to use reflection. I am not >>>> sure how to use reflection for this purpose. >>>> >>>> As an alternative, I figured I could write a second bundle that reads >>>> a series of files from a fixed location and uses the statistics >>>> bundle, as both would be inside the OSGi container. I can put these >>>> bundles into the bundle directory of the stand-alone felix framework >>>> and this works; however, I don't want felix to keep running after all >>>> the files are processed. >>>> >>>> What is the cleanest and easiest way to accomplish the task of >>>> providing input (file names) to a service and having it shutdown when >>>> finished? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Justin >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
