(felix.jar MANIFEST.MF has: Bundle-SymbolicName: org.apache.felix.main) org.apache.felix.framework works, but system.bundle gets: [java] org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle com.affymetrix.igb.Bookmark [2]: Unable to resolve 2.0: missing requirement [2.0 ] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=com.affymetrix.igb.shared) [caused b y: Unable to resolve 26.0: missing requirement [26.0] osgi.wiring.bundle; (osgi. wiring.bundle=system.bundle)]
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org>wrote: > On 1/5/12 13:33 , Lance Frohman wrote: > >> (system bundle - yes).I tried: >> >> Require-Bundle: batik-ext,org.apache.felix.**main >> and >> Require-Bundle: batik-ext,system.bundle >> >> both get: >> [java] WARNING: Could not create framework, plugins disabled: >> Unresolved co >> nstraint in bundle com.affymetrix.igb.Bookmark [2]: Unable to resolve 2.0: >> missi >> ng requirement [2.0] osgi.wiring.package; >> (osgi.wiring.package=com.**affymetrix.ig >> b.shared) [caused by: Unable to resolve 26.0: missing requirement [26.0] >> osgi.wi >> ring.bundle; (osgi.wiring.bundle=org.**apache.felix.main)] >> > > Well, org.apache.felix.main is not correct...however, system.bundle should > work, I believe. Did you get the same error with that? You could also try > org.apache.felix.framework, but if that works I'd expect system.bundle to > work too, unless there is a bug. If neither work, then it definitely sounds > like a bug. > > -> richard > > >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org>** >> wrote: >> >> On 1/5/12 13:07 , Lance Frohman wrote: >>> >>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Does this mean you figured out what the system bundle is? >>> >>> >>> "Modify the system bundle export of org.w3c.dom to some >>> >>>> arcane mandatory attribute ..." >>>> How do you do that? In the config file? >>>> >>>> Yeah, you have to do that in the configuration file. This is sort of a >>> pain since the default value is baked into the felix.jar file in >>> default.properties. Essentially, you set the org.osgi.framework.system.** >>> **packages >>> >>> property in conf/config.properties. Normally, it is not set here and >>> simply >>> it defaults to the value in felix.jar/default.properties file. >>> >>> So, what you'd need to do is copy out the default value in >>> default.properties and copy it into conf/config.properties. This is only >>> tricky because 1) there is some variable substitution going on in >>> default.properties (so you'll need to manually do that substitution) and >>> 2) >>> because the value is long, but otherwise it is just a simply setting the >>> property value. >>> >>> -> richard >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org>** >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 1/5/12 11:16 , Lance Frohman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> My project is using Apache Felix, and we are having a problem >>>>> >>>>>> with a split package. We are using xml with the regular java classes >>>>>> (jre), >>>>>> so we need to add org.w3c.dom to the Import-Package. We added some >>>>>> functionality that uses Apache Batik, but the batik-ext.jar has some >>>>>> classes in org.w3c.dom also. We tried both making batik into bundles >>>>>> using >>>>>> the bnd tool on the jar files, and just including the batik .jar files >>>>>> in >>>>>> the >>>>>> classpath, but neither method works. I have the OSGi in action book, >>>>>> but it does not mention this situation, just split packages between >>>>>> two >>>>>> bundles. What is the best way to resolve this problem? >>>>>> >>>>>> Like described in section 5.3, you could use Require-Bundle to >>>>>> >>>>> aggregate >>>>> the split package. It is sort of ugly, since you'd have to >>>>> Require-Bundle >>>>> the system bundle, but it would work. You can try to structure it >>>>> nicely >>>>> so >>>>> you have one bundle that requires the system bundle and includes the >>>>> additional org.w3c.dom classes and then exports the org.w3c.dom. Modify >>>>> the >>>>> system bundle export of org.w3c.dom to some arcane mandatory attribute >>>>> so >>>>> no one will use that one, then every import for org.w3c.dom should go >>>>> to >>>>> the bundle you create, which delegates to the system bundle for most of >>>>> the >>>>> classes and to itself for the remaining classes in org.w3c.dom. >>>>> >>>>> -> richard >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------******--------------------------**--** >>>>> --**--------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.****apac**he.org< >>>>> http://apache.org**> >>>>> <users-unsubscribe@**felix.**apache.org <http://felix.apache.org>< >>>>> users-unsubscribe@**felix.apache.org<users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------** >>> --**--------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> users-unsubscribe@felix.**apac**he.org<http://apache.org> >>> <users-unsubscribe@**felix.apache.org<users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org> >>> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org >>> >>> >>> > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > users-unsubscribe@felix.**apache.org<users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org > >