> Hi,
> 
> Am 02.08.2012 um 16:26 schrieb <[email protected]>:
> 
>> I'm using 4.0.1
> 
> Hmm, looking at the code the FindHook should actually be called. 
> 
> Is you FindHook called at all -- for other situations, too ? 

Yes it's called as soon as I'm using BundleContext.getServiceReference() 
elsewhere 

> 
> Is you DS component properly defined to use the bind method ? E.g. are you 
> sure to not mix Apache Felix SCR annotations with BND DS annotations ?

I'm using the Apache Felix SCR annotations.
 

Maybe I should prepare a little example and I send it to you?


> 
> Regards
> Felix
> 
> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>> Date: 02.08.2012 16:23:28
>> Subject: Re: DS and FindHook
>> 
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Am 02.08.2012 um 16:21 schrieb <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Felix,
>>>> 
>>>> thx for your answer. I completely forgot to tell that I'm using Apache 
>>>> Felix of course. 
>>>> 
>>>> I tried my FindHook with the more general way by calling 
>>>> BundleContext.getServiceReference and there it works. So as you told that 
>>>> must be an issue of the framework.
>>> 
>>> This of course bears the next question: Which version of the framework are 
>>> you using ?
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> Felix
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Greetings.
>>>> Christian
>>>> 
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Date: 02.08.2012 16:01:56
>>>> Subject: Re: DS and FindHook
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am 02.08.2012 um 14:32 schrieb <[email protected]>:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Today I worked a little bit with OSGi Hooks, specially with FindHook and 
>>>>>> EventListenerHook for services. I wanted to try out proxying services. 
>>>>>> The EventListenerHook works fine and my services are proxied. But I 
>>>>>> realized that the FindHook event would'nt be called if a service will 
>>>>>> get a reference of the service implementation by annotating the related 
>>>>>> setXXX method with @Reference (Bnd style). Maybe it is not a problem 
>>>>>> with the annotation, but with DS in general.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is quite bad, bc there are two services registered one without 
>>>>>> proxy and one proxied. I only want to get references from the proxied 
>>>>>> one. In general, without DS, you can get references by calling 
>>>>>> BundleContext.getServiceReference(java.lang.Class<S> clazz) and the 
>>>>>> event FindHook.find will be called, where you can decide which 
>>>>>> ServiceReference you want to return.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What kind of processes will be executed when I'm using DS like 
>>>>>> approaches (for me: Bnd annotation @Reference)? As I described in the 
>>>>>> above section: I want to decide which services should be referenced.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I can only speak for the Apache Felix DS implementation: I use the 
>>>>> BundleContext.getServiceReferences(String, String) to explicitly access 
>>>>> service references using the BundleContext of the respective context 
>>>>> (thus to also have OSGi security applied). I would assume that candidate 
>>>>> service references are send to the FilterHook before getting the result 
>>>>> to the DS implementation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So, unless there is a bug in the framework implementation or in your hook 
>>>>> registration, your hook should really be called. (and of course only if 
>>>>> the getServiceReferences call comes after your hook is registered.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Felix
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Greetings.
>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to