Hi, Am 01.11.2012 um 09:26 schrieb Neil Bartlett:
> Felix, > > Is the intention to continue supporting the current version, e.g. at least > with critical bug-fixes? We didn't discuss this and until now we didn't support fixes on back-releases. But in this case, it is conceivable that we maintain a branch for critical fixes on-demand. Regards Felix > If so I expect that the embedded community would > be happy to use this version and would not mind so much about losing out on > new features of DS 1.2+. > > Regards, > Neil > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Kjell Otto <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> just as a new user, go for the new version. >> If running under Java 5, you're definitly on an >> embedded system. For me, it's better to leverage >> the new features then haven a backwardscompatibility... >> >> Greetings, >> Kjellski >> >> >> 2012/11/1 Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The developers working on the Apache Felix Declarative Services >>> implementation are strongly considering leveraging Java 5 features and >> API >>> going forward. This would help alot simplifying and stabilizing the >>> implementation. >>> >>> Yet, going Java 5, we definitely leave the grounds of supporting embedded >>> use cases which at this point in time are largely based on Java ME 1.1 >>> which IIUIC is largely based on Java 1.4. >>> >>> What's the opinion of our user base in this question ? Do you require a >> DS >>> implementation from us supporting Java 1.4 ? Or are you happy with us >>> switching gears ? >>> >>> Thanks for any feedback. >>> >>> Regards >>> Felix >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
