Felix, Thanks for confirming - much appreciated.
-- David Gonzalez Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On Saturday, November 10, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi, > > Generally you have to provide the bind and unbind methods in your code unless > the @Reference has single cardinality, in which case the methods are > automatically generated, or if you define the @Reference to not have bind and > unbind methods. > > In your case, you have to ceate the bind and unbind methods. > > Regards > Felix > > Am 10.11.2012 um 17:39 schrieb David G.: > > > Can @Reference annotations be used to directly gain access to multiple > > Service objects? > > > > I tried the following, using List, Arrays, and Vectors as the data types to > > no avail; > > > > @Reference(cardinality=ReferenceCardinality.OPTIONAL_MULTIPLE) > > List<SomeService> someServices; > > > > ...The build complained about the bind and unbind methods not undefined > > (which is true in my experiment class). > > > > Are bind/unbind required to access multiple services from a single > > reference; "manually" retrieving service objects via service refs? > > > > If there is a shortcut as described above using @Reference (or some other > > mechanism), how is the order determined (ranking?) > > > > All i could find wrt to using @Reference is on the felix site [1] .. > > > > Thanks! > > > > [1] > > http://felix.apache.org/site/scr-annotations.html#SCRAnnotations-Reference > > > > -- > > David Gonzalez > > Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]) > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]) > >
