I guess this is not the issue. From my understanding, Aries in itself is already too heavy for him and he would like the "Subsystems specification and Common Namespaces Specification" implementation alone.
Don't know if it makes sense... JP -----Message d'origine----- De : Richard S. Hall [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : mercredi 9 octobre 2013 14:32 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: Apache Felix and OSGI R5 On 10/9/13 08:07 , Roland wrote: > Hi, > thanks for your reply. I am asking because I do not want to obtain > additional overhead by the integration of Apache Aries (concerning the > starttime). I need a very lightweight implemention. What makes you think an implementation at Felix would be any lighter weight? This is not something integrated into the framework, it is an externally implemented piece of functionality. Just like any bundle. The weight of the implementation is purely dependent on implementation choices and not in which project it originated. -> richard > Regards > Roland > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Apache-Felix-and-OSGI-R5-tp500 > 4939p5005462.html Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list > archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
