I didn't know that RS was already in a usable state - thanks for the
comprehensive information Scott!
Lots of new toys to play with :-)

warm regards,
Dawid


On 17/09/2014 21:00, Scott Lewis wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I suggest you consider a relatively new OSGi enterprise specification
> called Remote Services (RS) [1].
>
> Short story for Remote Services (why it appears relevant to what you
> are doing):  the RS specification provides a way to extend the OSGi
> service registry (i.e. and any of your services) for out-of-process
> access to OSGi services.   The specification does this in a completely
> transport-independent way, meaning that implementations can/do use
> existing JAX RS web services, REST+json, binary protocols, JMS, MQTT,
> or any other (e.g. custom) remoting transport, and get all of the
> advantages of using OSGi services without requiring the service host
> or consumer to be permanently bound to any one transport/wire
> protocol/serialization format.
>
> There are two R6 spec-compliant implementations of RS/RSA that I know of:
>
> ECF [2]
> Amdatu [3]
>
> Full disclosure:  I'm the ECF project lead and participate in the OSGi
> Enterprise Experts Group (EEG).
>
> My main point above is that you should consider using these emerging
> standards (RS/RSA), as they simplify the use of remoting with OSGi
> services and deal with some fundamental issues:
>
> discovery
> dynamics in remoting/failure-prone environments
> versioning of service APIs
> standardized endpoint description format
> all the other good things that come with using OSGi services (e.g.
> loose coupling of components, multiple mature injection frameworks,
> security, lots of support/experience with OSGi services, etc)
> a standardized management agent (RSA)
>
> These advantages come for 'free' when RS/RSA is used, no matter which
> implementation is used (ECF, Amdatu, or some other).
>
> ECF as RS/RSA implementation
>
> One possible misunderstanding:  ECF does not require nor is bound in
> any way to the use of Eclipse, the use of Equinox as OSGi Framework,
> HttpService implementation, or even the use of a particular dependency
> manager like DS or the Apache dependency manager.   That is, any/all
> of these and/or others may be used alongside ECF's RS/RSA impl for
> development, testing, and deployment.  Further, we now specifically
> support install/usage as Karaf features [4].
>
> Here is the wiki-based documentation about ECF [5].    One technical
> point of potential value to you is that ECF has an open, modular, and
> documented provider architecture, allowing users to substitute their
> own implementations of the distribution/transport/wire protocol if the
> existing providers (which currently does include JAX RS web services
> in addition to ~6 others created by the ECF team) do not meet your
> security and/or integration needs.
>
> Scott
>
> [1] http://www.osgi.org/Specifications/Drafts
> [2] https://www.eclipse.org/ecf/
> [3] http://www.amdatu.org
> [4] https://wiki.eclipse.org/EIG:Install_into_Apache_Karaf
> [5] https://wiki.eclipse.org/ECF#OSGi_Remote_Services
>
> On 9/17/2014 9:38 AM, Andrew Beechey wrote:
>> Dear, users Felix Apache, I work for a large financial institution
>> that is looking to move is development from mainframe  Cobol cics
>> db2, into distributed Java. The types of applications we need to
>> develop are JAX RS web services accessing a mainframe hosted db2
>> database. These web services need to perform the classic CRUD
>> actions. I have been investigating OSGi and feel it has much to
>> offer, my problem is I have no idea where to start, then I came
>> across ipojo, what I can't seem to find is any mention of ipojo
>> creating JAX RS web services. Is it possible to expose JAX RS web
>> services with ipojo? Where can I find examples and/or tutorials to
>> learn how to develop these types of services with ipojo?
>>
>> Warm regards
>>
>> Andrew Beechey
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to