Hi, On 20 octobre 2014 at 18:15:50, Simon Chemouil (schemo...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hey again! Great, so, should I open a bug, or something. It would be pretty cool to have a fix by the next release :). Please do. Also, it would be very nice if there was a the proper capacity generation, similar to what Bnd now does with DS (to work with R5 resolvers/repositories): Provide-Capability: osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass="com.my.provided.Service" Require-Capability: osgi.service;effective:=active;filter:="(&(objectCla ss=com.my.provided.Service)(someProperty=foo))",osgi.ee;filter:="(& (osgi.ee=JavaSE)(version=1.8))" One should be careful that BND always generate an osgi.ee entry in Require-Capability, so iPOJO must somehow add to it rather than replace it. Once again, I can open a bug, and I can contribute the patch if given the right pointers. Yes, open a bug. The manipulator has the capability to modify the manifest (it adds the IPOJO-COMPONENTS header). So probably a good place to do such addition. I’m more concerned on how such metadata can be computed, as the manipulator does not interpret and understand the metadata (it’s just there to write them, the interpretation can only be done at runtime). Cheers, Clement Cheers, Simon Le 17/10/2014 22:07, Guillaume Sauthier (OW2) a écrit : > It’s not really similar, wisdom is not using @stereotypes discovery, it > simply declares a BindingModule that will register some annotations in the > framework (along with the associated behaviour). > > In fact, what happen is that the Bnd plugin is not creating a new > AnnotationMetadataProvider with a ServiceLoaderModuleProvider. > By default, the AMP does not search for available modules, it only uses the > default core module. > > Looks like it’s a simple fix > > -- > Guillaume Sauthier (OW2) > Sent with Airmail > > On 17 Oct 2014 at 19:11:52, Clement Escoffier (clement.escoff...@gmail.com) > wrote: > > Hi, > > Guillaume would be more precise, but it might be > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4668. > Will try to have a look over the weekend. > > Cheers, > > Clement > On 17 octobre 2014 at 15:27:09, Simon Chemouil (schemo...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Hey, > > I'm looking to use a manipulation-time iPojo extension module > (wisdom-ipojo-module) with the Bnd iPojo plugin from Maven... and the > Pojoization BND plugin can't seem to find wisdom-ipojo-module. I checked > the build output with -X, Maven does pass the iPojo extension to BND > along with the iPojo Bnd plugin, but iPojo can't seem to find it :) > > Well, re-reading this ... let's just say even XML will be clearer :) > > Here's the working version with iPojo Maven Plugin: > > <plugin> > <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId> > <artifactId>maven-bundle-plugin</artifactId> > <version>2.5.3</version> > <extensions>true</extensions> > <configuration> > <instructions> > <_include>bnd.bnd</_include> > </instructions> > </configuration> > </plugin> > > <plugin> > <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId> > <artifactId>maven-ipojo-plugin</artifactId> > <version>1.12.0</version> > <executions> > <execution> > <goals> > <goal>ipojo-bundle</goal> > </goals> > </execution> > </executions> > <dependencies> > <dependency> > <groupId>org.wisdom-framework</groupId> > <artifactId>wisdom-ipojo-module</artifactId> > <version>${wisdom.version}</version> > </dependency> > </dependencies> > </plugin> > > > > And here's the version using the Bnd Ipojo Plugin that doesn't work but > should be equivalent: > > <plugin> > <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId> > <artifactId>maven-bundle-plugin</artifactId> > <version>2.5.3</version> > <extensions>true</extensions> > <configuration> > <instructions> > <_plugin> > org.apache.felix.ipojo.bnd.PojoizationPlugin > </_plugin> > <_include>bnd.bnd</_include> > </instructions> > </configuration> > <dependencies> > <dependency> > <groupId>org.wisdom-framework</groupId> > <artifactId>wisdom-ipojo-module</artifactId> > <version>${wisdom.version}</version> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId> > <artifactId>bnd-ipojo-plugin</artifactId> > <version>1.12.0</version> > </dependency> > </dependencies> > </plugin> > > Obviously, I prefer the latter since it allows me to configure all OSGi > projects with only a 2-liner maven-bundle-plugin build declaration, > whether it's iPojo or DS. > > I suspect the culprit is in the Bnd Ipojo Module, but an early look at > the code didn't give a clear reason why. > > Any pointers appreciated (Guillaume or Clément?) > > Cheers, > > -- > Simon > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org
