> I read an article this morning here.
> http://akarnokd.blogspot.hu/2015/11/asynchronous-event-streams-vs-reactive.html
>
>
> My guess is that util.promises were more designed with OSGI services in mind
> rather than event streams so that is why some of the design decisions were
> made the way they were. I did think the author did have a couple of points
> though. I am still new to streams and osgi and think much of the article was
> over my head. I was hoping others could give me their feelings on some of the
> criticisms where the author may have had a point or been on the wrong track?
> Does the felix event admin use the promises library under the hood or is it
> completely separate because they are both at the compendium level and it
> would be a bad idea to have dependencies on other compendium libs. Is there a
> good example out there where I can take a look at the code and see how I
> should be looking to implement eventadmin with promises and streams.
>
> Thanks for any advise,
> David Daniel
