On 1/12/16 11:59 , Thomas Draier wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:45 PM Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org>
wrote:
So, are you saying that when you get a resolved event for some arbitrary
bundle, you are running into issues because some of its dependencies are
not yet treated as if they are resolved? What is the symptom you see?
Well, I just did receive the resolved event for the dependencies (Y,Z)
after receiving the event for the bundle having the dependencies (X),
instead of the opposite. Of course, it's not always the case, it happens
for some bundles only, as the order is random. But yes, all of them are
marked as resolved when I get the first event, and all events will
eventually be sent.
What I'm trying to get at is, why is this problematic for you if you get
them out of order? Are you try to load a class and it fails, for
example. Or does it just make you uncomfortable?
-> richard
Yes, that's the reverse order, not that this terminology is super
important.
Ok, whatever, just to be sure we were talking of the same order.
Thomas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org
