Hi,
  Our product is going through security review and as per security it is
breach if https://localhost:8443/gogo is accessible in any browser without
authentication. It is not cache issue as we can access in newly created
firefox browser.
If there any way to restrict root /gogo URL?

Thanks
Srikanth

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com>
wrote:

> Hi Srikanth,
>
> This, I agree, is not ok. But unless you registerd the web console to the
> root /gogo is not a web console URL but something else (or is it typo ?)
>
> By default authentication is using HTTP Basic authentication which by
> browsers is implemented by caching as long as the browser is running. If
> your restart the browser or use a different browser, authentication should
> be requested.
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
>
> > Am 11.11.2016 um 14:52 schrieb srou...@gmail.com:
> >
> > Hi,
> > In this case https://localhost:8443/gogo directly  displays karaf
> console without asking webconsole authorization credentials.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Srikanth
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On Nov 11, 2016, at 3:24 AM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Srikanth
> >>
> >> You are already authenticated when you access the web console. I would
> think that the assumption is that double authentication is nonsense.
> >>
> >> What we discussed earlier would be some form of access control, so that
> only certain users may access certain features. But AFAICT there has not
> been any work done on this front.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Felix
> >>
> >>> Am 11.11.2016 um 00:51 schrieb Srikanth Routhu <srou...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> We are using Karaf 3.0.7 along with webconsole which is authenticated
> >>> using realm. SSH also uses realm for authentication. But from firefox
> >>> browser https://localhost:8443/gogo link directly access Karaf console
> >>> without any authentication. How can we restrict access.
> >>>
> >>> Tried restricting “/gogo/*” from web.xml but unsuccessful.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Appreciate your help.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Srikanth
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to