Yes, precisely! I was long struggling with it but I think in the spirit of felix.logback trying to just make logging work super well with minimal setup, I just embedded to JUL bridge directly into it and it will automatically be applied. I figure this is the most effective and desirable approach to reduce friction.
- Ray On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 9:48 AM Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Ray, > > On Sun, 2018-11-25 at 11:55 -0500, Raymond Auge wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 7:50 AM Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am looking into using the felix logback module. The main setup > > works > > > just fine, and anything using slf4j routes its logging through this > > > module. > > > > > > In my application one bundle (aries-spi-fly) uses java.util.logging > > > APIs. Digging through the felix.logback tests I discovered that > > there > > > are two ways to configure this bridge: > > > > > > a. Create a bundle that programatically installs the bridge > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/felix/tree/trunk/logback/itests/standard-jul > > > > > > I haven't tried this, but it looks like this is a regular bundle, > > no > > > special setup required. > > > > > > b. Configure the JUL handlers using a properties file > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/felix/tree/trunk/logback/itests/immediate-jul > > > > > > AFAIU, this requires that the system bundle has visibility into the > > > slf4j classes, so that some org.slf4j classes are attached to the > > sytem > > > bundle (I'm not familiar with bndrun files, so please excuse any > > > imprecisions). > > > > > > A couple of questions regarding this setup: > > > > > > 1. Is my understanding on how to setup a JUL-to-slf4j bridge > > correct? > > > > > > 2. Would you consider a way of automatically setting up this > > bridge? > > > Ideally dropping in the jul-to-slf4j bundle should be all that is > > > required. > > > > > > > Hey Robert, > > > > I struggled with this a little bit. I would like to do this but I'm > > not > > sure the least intrusive way. The only thing I could come up with was > > to > > include the code somewhere in launcher code which was ugly. > > > > Any ideas are very welcome. > > > > Sincerely, > > - Ray > > I did not get any bright ideas it seems :-) Did this get fixed with > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6027 > > ? > > Robert > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org > > -- *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay) Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)
