Hm, that would be new - are you sure that happens on java11 and how
did you start-up the framework?
regards,
Karl
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:08 PM Chuck Davis <cjgun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Karl:
>
> This seems to be the root cause of the other exceptions I'm dealing with.
> Obviously, there is no longer a java.net to open. I don't know if the
> highlighting will transmit but the problems is: "Caused by:......
>
> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to make protected boolean
> java.net.URLStreamHandler.equals(java.net.URL,java.net.URL) accessible:
> module java.base does not "opens java.net" to module
> org.apache.felix.framework
> at org.apache.felix.framework@6.0.2
> /org.apache.felix.framework.URLHandlersStreamHandlerProxy.<clinit>(URLHandlersStreamHandlerProxy.java:104)
> ... 15 more
> Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make
> protected boolean
> java.net.URLStreamHandler.equals(java.net.URL,java.net.URL) accessible:
> module java.base does not "opens java.net" to module
> org.apache.felix.framework
> at
> java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:340)
> at
> java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:280)
> at
> java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.checkCanSetAccessible(Method.java:198)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.setAccessible(Method.java:192)
> at org.apache.felix.framework@6.0.2
> /org.apache.felix.framework.util.SecureAction.setAccesssible(SecureAction.java:871)
> at org.apache.felix.framework@6.0.2
> /org.apache.felix.framework.URLHandlersStreamHandlerProxy.<clinit>(URLHandlersStreamHandlerProxy.java:79)
> ... 15 more
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:53 AM Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The framework itself should work ootb on java11 just fine. Likewise, I
> > think the default distribution should work on java11 too (i.e., the
> > shell).
> >
> > Not sure about other bundles - feel free to follow-up with your set-up
> > and the exceptions you see.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Karl
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 1:43 PM Chuck Davis <cjgun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for responding, Rob. I'm very new to OSGi and that sounds like a
> > > LOT of tinkering to me (overwhelming in fact at this point !!).
> > >
> > > But the more I study it the more it makes sense to me and the exceptions
> > > I'm seeing.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your response.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 8:44 PM Rob Walker <r...@ascert.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > We have worked our Felix based app so that it runs on JDK11 - took a
> > bit
> > > > of tinkering, but there wasn't anything in core code we had to change.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We did need to load the following bundles separately to replace missing
> > > > classes:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > jre-1.8_extra_bundles=
> > > >
> > > > jre-9_extra_bundles=${j9_replacement_packages}
> > > >
> > > > jre-10_extra_bundles=${j9_replacement_packages}
> > > >
> > > > jre-11_extra_bundles=${j9_replacement_packages}
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Karl Pauls
> > karlpa...@gmail.com
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org
> >
> >
--
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org
