On 2/22/13 8:05 AM, "Lucas Junqueira / Ciclope" <lu...@ciclope.art.br>
wrote:
> 11.1 is the default, but it does compile for 10.2. The idea of getting it
> to work on 10.1 is nice since it would cover a much larget user audience...
I don't recall off-hand what doesn't compile with 10.1, but it would not be
my choice to lose parity with Adobe Flex 4.6. If you have time to build the
list of features that won't work we can discuss what our options are.
>
> 2013/2/22 Lee Kulberda <lkulbe...@nxtbookmedia.com>
>
>> I have been told it is 11.1. Am I wrong?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> HI,
>>>
>>>> I believe Apache Flex 4.9 has a minimum 10.2 player version
>> requirement,
>>>> right? (I wonder why isn't it 10.1 since many devices, like smart tvs,
>>>> still use it).
>>>
>>> The current SDK uses features/API that doesn't compile with 10.1. With
>>> some modification it may be possible to get Apache Flex 4.9 to run under
>>> 10.1.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Justin
>>
>
>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
