Note that the destructionPolicy="never" attribute value may be misleading (it was for me): it only affects what happens to the view instances when another view instance is pushed upon it (i.e. will it be recreated or not when the user go back to it).. view instances are always destroyed when the they are popped out of the view stack, even with destructionPolicy="never".
2013/6/10 Tianzhen Lin <[email protected]> > Another approach would be using framework such as Robotlegs where the > view/control can be initialized via Mediator. I have used the > container-agnostic approach for quite some time and already forgot about > this weird behavior of Views. > > Tangent > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cristian Spiescu [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2013 4:56 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ViewNavigator: using view instance instead of view class > > Thanks for the tip! > > Regards, > Cristian > On Jun 9, 2013 7:24 PM, "Jonathan Campos" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Most people just create a good method to set the values as soon as the > > view is created. Just respond to the viewActivate method. Trust me > > that is the easiest way :) > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Cristian Spiescu < > > [email protected] > > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks! This was my impression as well; > > > > > > you can change the destruction policy so that it isn't destroyed > > >> > > > This is true, but I'd need the instance before passing it to the > > > view navigator, so that I can populate some data, the "classic way" > > > (not by passing the data through the "data" parameter). > > > > > > get into the guts of Flex > > >> > > > Yes; looks doable, by hacking the viewNavigator.navigationStack > > > (visibility mx_internal). > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Cristian. > > > > > > > > > On 08.06.2013 21:03, Jonathan Campos wrote: > > > > > >> you can change the destruction policy so that it isn't destroyed. > > >> And > > you > > >> could get into the guts of Flex and make this change. But I don't > > believe > > >> it is readily available. > > >> > > >> J > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Cristian Spiescu < > > >> [email protected] > > >> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> Hello, > > >>> > > >>> In some cases, I would like to push to the stack an instance of a > > >>> view that is already constructed. > > >>> Is this possible? > > >>> > > >>> Thanks in advance! > > >>> Cristian. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jonathan Campos > > > >
