On 9/3/2013 1:49 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
4.10.0 release should look like this:
<flex-sdk-description>
<name>Apache Flex 4.10.0 FP11.1 AIR3.7 en_US</name>
<version>4.10.0</version>
<build>20130801</build>
</flex-sdk-description>
what i have here is the same:
<flex-sdk-description>
<name>Apache Flex 4.10.0 FP 11.8 AIR 3.8 en_US</name>
<version>4.10.0</version>
<build>20130801</build>
</flex-sdk-description>
The ideal way would be to compare MD5/signature of what was downloaded with the
official release, but I assume the installer removed that.
is there official signature available? i can check to see if the installer
removed, it matches, etc.
to me this is kind of a cosmetic problem as the RSL works no matter what its
called (i messed up editing the file name in the flex config file & it just spat
out charts.swf & the module worked fine w/it). i'm slightly more concerned about
the "magical" nature of the charts RSL--needing to be in same location as
modules using it vs none of the other RSL behaving the same. but neither are
real show stoppers for me (right now).
