They are not that much slower with simple usage,. MXML just wires or sets up things automatically for you even if didn't explicitly set them up yourself.
Just don't bog them down either the AS/MXML down. Use things like a datachange event instead of bindings, contentcache / cacheasbitmap for the images n such. You probably won't notice a difference. -Mark -----Original Message----- From: Cristian Spiescu [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: renderer performance mxml vs actionscript Hello, I have an additional question regarding this subject, that intrigued me: why are MXML renderers slower? Aren't they translated to ActionScript code? Thanks. Best regards, Cristian. On 18.09.2013 09:46, Federico De Maddalena wrote: > Hi, > I read in some internet web pages, and someone in this group told me, > that an item renderer wrote in mxml has worse performance than the same > renderer wrote in pure actionscript. ok i believe and i trust this, but > are there studies or analysis that demonstate this thesis? particularly, > it would be interesting to see a comparison with the results on the > performance. I don't know if someone has already done this study! > Bye > Federico >
