That means I will have to modify existing code that references this object. That is what I am trying to avoid.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Tom Chiverton <[email protected]> wrote: > You could give your object a method that returns an object of the other > type, and populate the properties as you like. > > Tom > > > On 30/10/2013 15:42, mark goldin wrote: > >> Is it possible to make an object of a some type exposing itself as of >> another type without casting? >> Extending Proxy is what I need to look into? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> ______________________________**______________________________** >> __________ >> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. >> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com >> ______________________________**______________________________** >> __________ >> > >
