What kind of project are you attempting to create? desktop, browser, mobile?
Are you compiling with cmd line or an IDE? On 18/02/2014 01:36, bgoldnyxnet wrote:
My top-level mxml file looks like this: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <s:WindowedApplication xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" xmlns:loc="location.*" xmlns:ch="choices.*" xmlns:step="script_step.*" pageTitle="Gasper Heights" height="600" weight="800" backgroundColor="#FFFFFF"> ... </s:WindowedApplication> When I go to compile it, I get the error message: compile: [mxmlc] Loading configuration file C:\barry\bin\flex\sdks\4.6.0\frameworks\flex-config.xml [mxmlc] C:\dn\inprogress\GHen\flex\GHen\src\GHen.mxml: Error: Unable to locate specified base class 'spark.components.WindowedApplication' for component class 'GHen'. [mxmlc] What's up with that? When I look in the API reference, spark.components.WindowedApplication is there. Do I need to change my build file to use amxmlc instead of mxmlc? Perhaps more generally, is there a reason to use AIR and/or a reason _not_ to use AIR? If I have a .swf file on my disk and double-click it, the Windows Shell opens it in my brower-of-choice, so I don't see exactly what AIR is for. Or, contrariwise, any disadvantage to building the application for AIR (at least for debugging). Comments? -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Missing-WindowedApplication-tp5021.html Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- Lee Burrows ActionScripter
