If "hard work" can be understood that easily, then there's no value to steal, otherwise it's not easy to steal, because the value is always the ability to continue "generate" working code.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Claude BERNARDINI < [email protected]> wrote: > You can use SecureSWF. > > Works well for Air Desktop and Android Apps > > Be careful, max protection level can crash or bug your app > > > > Le 2014-02-19 16:21, Sean Thayne a écrit : > > I'm actually more concerned about the plain readability of the AS3, even >> comments are easily viewable. Where as a JS site that has been compile >> with >> Google Closures is minimized and heavily obscured. I feel like it would be >> very easy to steal someones hard work. >> >> -Sean Thayne >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Gary Yang <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Client side can not be trusted, server api should always be the security >> gate! >> >> After all there are certain applications that can encrypt Flash >> applications, Javascript application is just plain text!!! >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Sean Thayne <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Anybody else concerned about decompilers like SoThink? >> > >> > http://www.ericzhang.me/cracking-adobe-air-applications/ >> > >> > -Sean Thayne >> > >> >>
