It seems to me that they got strong armed into it. I think though that if they were smart they'd continue to support both platforms especially given the differences. For those who have used both I think is where the opinions on better originate from. I've always preferred the way graphics and other things are handled within the tailored runtime as opposed to the use of a browser and a wrapper. Also HTML has been harassed into the "only" presentation layer for years now when it has a lot of flaws beyond just printing out data etc.
David -----Original Message----- From: Alain Ekambi <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Sent: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:19 AM Subject: Re: Ahhh Adobe... @Jeffry Just thinking ... I m Adobe CEO On one hand I have this awesome runtime I bough from Macromedia. Great tooling. Great community. Great results over the years. Trully cross plarform. Performs wells. On the other hand I have this CSS/HTML/JS based bridge I bought from Notobi. Performs like crap (when using jquery mobile). No tooling. Community is .. OK. Results are ... OK. Which one will I promote more ? Where will I put more engineering efforts ? You tell me .... 2014-03-27 16:44 GMT+01:00 Jeffry Houser <[email protected]>: > > Can you enlighten me as to why this is stupid? > > [Maybe this list isn't the place for this conversation, though] > > > On 3/27/2014 8:49 AM, Alain Ekambi wrote: > >> With no offense with the people working at Adobe on this list. >> But how a company can be this stupid ? >> >> http://blogs.adobe.com/digitalmarketing/web-experience/adobe-experience- >> manager-mobile-app-announcement/ >> >> > > -- > Jeffry Houser > Technical Entrepreneur > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > 203-379-0773 > >
