It’s a desktop app, no applicationDPI or runtimeDPI set, no embedding fonts. No widths set on labels.
The 4.9.1 might look zoomed as the text is noticeably fuzzier when I switch back to the old SDK. On 3 Jun 2014, at 06:07, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users] <[email protected]> wrote: > Is this a mobile app? Have you set applicationDPI or runtimeDPI? Are you > embedding fonts? > > The 4.9.1 version looks like it is zoomed, and maybe that widths are set > pretty tightly. If fonts are not embedded and a different zoom level is > used, the fonts may not resize with the same metrics and result in > truncation. > > -Alex > > On 6/1/14 11:29 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > >On 2 Jun 2014, at 08:19, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users] > ><[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> I'm unable to understand which pics are which. I see 3 with what looks > >> like undesirable truncation, and two that are labelled > >> truncateToFit=false. I'm expecting to see two images that look > >>identical > >> except for some truncation difference but with truncateToFit=true for > >>both > >> 4.9.1 and 4.12.0. > >> > >> -Alex > >> > >> On 6/1/14 10:40 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> > >> >Last SDK was 4.9.1. Was installed via the apache flex installer so AIR > >> >version was up to date at that point, probably 3.4? > >> >Text was fuzzier but no overzealous truncation (whereas with new SDK > >> >there is lots of overzealous truncation - on a macbook pro retina at > >> >least). > >> >Couple pics in archive attached of 4.9.1 version without the > >> >truncateToFit=false fixes. > >> > > >> > > >> >On 2 Jun 2014, at 05:51, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users] > >> ><[hidden email]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> I don't think I saw before pictures. What did it look like in > >>whatever > >> >> version of the SDK that was working as expected? > >> >> > >> >> On 6/1/14 12:35 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >Here you go - hope it helps > >> >> > > >> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 08:00, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users] > >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> OK, how about posting before and after bitmaps? It's ok to fuzz > >>the > >> >> >>text, > >> >> >> I just want to see how the truncation changed, so leave the > >>spaces > >> >>in > >> >> >> there. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -Alex > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On 5/31/14 10:45 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >I¹ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case but > >>thus > >> >> >>far > >> >> >> >I¹m unable toŠ In a simple test case with a small amount of the > >> >>same > >> >> >>code > >> >> >> >the overzealous truncation didn¹t occur (I tired a very small > >> >>resource > >> >> >> >bundle but still no dice) > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+ classes) > >>and > >> >> >>using > >> >> >> >resourceBundles / locales in case it helps > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users] > >> >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case? > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Thanks, > >> >> >> >> -Alex > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local > >>machine > >> >>at > >> >> >> >>least by > >> >> >> >> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting an > >> >> >>explicit > >> >> >> >> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though! > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the > >> >> >>excellently > >> >> >> >>sharp > >> >> >> >> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know if > >> >>that > >> >> >>was > >> >> >> >>AIR > >> >> >> >> >or Flex to thank for that) > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >Cheers > >> >> >> >> >Peter > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >-- > >> >> >> >> >View this message in context: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncat > >>>>>>>>>io > >> >>>>>>>n- > >> >> >>>>>of > >> >> >> >>>-m > >> >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html > >> >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at > >> >>Nabble.com. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > >> >> >> >>discussion below: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncati > >>>>>>>>on > >> >>>>>>-o > >> >> >>>>f- > >> >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html > >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click > >> >>here. > >> >> >> >> NAML > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >-- > >> >> >> >View this message in context: > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > >>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncatio > >>>>>>>n- > >> >>>>>of > >> >> >>>-m > >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6715.html > >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at > >>Nabble.com. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > >> >> >>discussion below: > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > >>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation > >>>>>>-o > >> >>>>f- > >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6716.html > >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click > >>here. > >> >> >> NAML > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >Archive.zip (130K) > >> >> > >> > >>>>><http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6717/0/Arch > >>>>>iv > >> >>>e. > >> >> >zip> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >-- > >> >> >View this message in context: > >> >> > >> > >>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation- > >>>>>of > >> >>>-m > >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6717.html > >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > >> >>discussion below: > >> >> > >> > >>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-o > >>>>f- > >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6718.html > >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here. > >> >> NAML > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >Archive 2.zip (92K) > >> ><<a > >>href="http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/Ar > >>chive%">http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/ > >>Archive% > >> >202.zip> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >-- > >> >View this message in context: > >> > >>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of > >>>-m > >> >x-labels-tp6710p6719.html > >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> > >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > >>discussion below: > >> > >>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of- > >>mx-labels-tp6710p6720.html > >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here. > >> NAML > > > > > > > >Archive 3.zip (155K) > ><<a > >href="http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6721/0/Archive%";>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6721/0/Archive% > >203.zip> > > > > > > > > > >-- > >View this message in context: > >http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m > >x-labels-tp6710p6721.html > >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6749.html > To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here. > NAML -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6750.html Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
