Great article, thank you. It's good to discover this functionality. Though I'm now starting to think it's impossible to do what I was hoping without describeType[JSON]? I find it strange. On 24 Jun 2014 18:22, "Mark Line" <[email protected]> wrote:
> This might help: http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/2609 > On 24 Jun 2014 18:08, "Mihai Chira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It does do it, but I was hoping I could achieve it with > > hasOwnProperty() because it's in a memory and speed-sensitive area of > > the application. > > > > On 24 June 2014 17:06, Subscriptions <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > describeType might do the job > > > > > > > > > http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/flash/utils/package.html#describeType() > > > > > > > > > > > > On 24/06/2014 16:46, Mihai Chira wrote: > > >> > > >> Is there a way to check if an object instance has a non-public > > >> property if you know its namespace? > > >> > > >> If you say object.hasOwnProperty("name") it will only return true if > > >> "name" is public. However, it returns false if "name" is, say, > > >> mx_internal (or under another namespace): mx_internal var name:String; > > >> > > >> I've tried: > > >> > > >> object.hasOwnProperty("name"); //false > > >> object.hasOwnProperty(new QName(mx_internal, "name")); //false > > >> object.hasOwnProperty(new > > >> QName("http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal";, "name")); //false > > >> > > >> Any ideas? This web post[1] seems to imply that at least at one point > > >> it was possible to use QName in conjunction with non-XML objects' > > >> hasOwnProperty() function. Has this changed, or am I doing something > > >> wrong? > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> > > >> [1] http://www.leichtgewicht.at/718/mastering-as3-namespaces/#qname > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Lee Burrows > > > ActionScripter > > > > > >
