It’s optional. playerproductInstall is Adobe-proprietary so Apache Flex opted to use expressInstall instead.
On 1/8/15, 10:25 AM, "DavidM" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, I've been upgrading an old (2011) flex app and, as an experiment, >decided >to generate a new application with Flash Builder 4.7 and compare with that >generated in 2011 using Flash Builder 4.5. > >This is what I discovered: > >identical: > index.template.html > >completely different: > swfobject.js > >additionally the file: playerProductInstall.swf >is replaced by: expresinstall.swf > >So, my question is this: is it recommended to replace the files: >swfobject.js and playerProductInstall.swf > >with the newer swfobject.js and the expresinstall.swf > >Thanks > >David > > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/upgrading-old-application-e >xpressInstall-swf-vs-playerProductInstall-swf-tp9357.html >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
