Currently, the only IDEs that fully support FlexJS are Flash Builder[1] and FDT [2] FlexJS is indeed available via the Apache Flex Installer tool. You will see it listed in the 'Select Flex Version' dropdown. If you are adventurous, you can try out the nightly version (with all the latest features and bug fixes, but not officially released) by right clicking anywhere on the installer and clicking on the 'Show Dev Builds' option. Now you will see the 'Apache FlexJS Nightly' option available in the flex versions dropdown.
Hope that helps. Thanks, Om [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Using+FlexJS+with+Adobe+Flash+Builder [2] http://fdt.powerflasher.com/2014/05/apache-flexjs-compiler-support/ On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Lane Friesen <lanefrie...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi Om, > > That is truly amazing that a site with this kind of intricacy could > actually be ported into something that would run on an iPAD Safari browser, > bypassing the Apple AppStore. > > I'm quite comfortable with pulling in screens one by one and adjusting > things until they run - that's my preferred method of development. If there > are bugs, then I'll work around them. I'll find a way. What I'm not sure > about is how to install the FlexJS sdk. You mentioned in your talk that the > sdk can be installed on Flashbuilder. You did not mention IntelliJ. I find > IntelliJ to be superior in just about every measure. Does it work on > IntelliJ? If not, then how precisely would one install it in Flashbuilder? > > I am not at all familiar with Flexmojos or Maven or any of the > manipulations required to work with them. That stuff is complete Greek to > me. However, once I have an sdk installed on a system such as (hopefully) > IntelliJ, then I'm off and running. Is there something like the Apache Flex > SDK Installer that can download a FlexJS sdk, in the same way that one > downloads Flex 4.14.1? > > Thanks in advance, > > Lane. > > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 5:48 AM > To: <users@flex.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Possible FlexJS Port > > > Here is the link to the video again: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJBTOL-5LWI >> >> Lane, I looked at the cognitivestyles.com site. It does not look too >> difficult to convert it into a FlexJS application. Although, I will let >> Alex or Peter answer this questions with more authority. >> >> I do see that there are some audio elements used. I am not sure if FlexJS >> supports audio yet. >> >> Best approach would be to start playing with FlexJS and get comfortable >> with getting the example apps up and running. Then, you can start porting >> the screens one by one to FlexJS. If you run into issues, you can always >> ask here. We can help answer and even better, add features to FlexJS as >> required. >> >> Hope that helps. >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Miguel Ferreira < >> miguel.cd.ferre...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> I missed the link can anyone share it again please. >>> >>> > From: lanefrie...@hotmail.com >>> > To: users@flex.apache.org >>> > Subject: Possible FlexJS Port >>> > Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 18:01:40 +0900 >>> > >>> > Hi Om, >>> > >>> > I watched your video with interest. Is it possible to translate the > >>> code >>> > found at http://cognitivestyles.com into javascript using FlexJS? This >>> is an >>> > ancient and poorly organized Flash-based website that badly needs >>> updating >>> > into the current edited version of the material (which has been > >>> extended >>> > into 650 lessons and tested over the past several years with students). >>> > Could something similar to this code be ported into javascript through >>> > FlexJS so that it runs on a browser without the Flash plugin? >>> > >>> > Please note the tab structure on the bottom. Choosing a lesson from the >>> > Lessons tab sets up exercises for that lesson in the other tabs. This >>> > is >>> > therefore a program with multiple aspects, not a web site in the > >>> ordinary >>> > sense. >>> > >>> > I own both Flashbuilder 4.7 and IntelliJ Ultimate and could use either >>> > as >>> > required. If it's helpful, I could send you the Flex-based Android apk >>> file >>> > of the current app, which is highly tested, popular with students and >>> close >>> > to final release, so that you can see exactly what would be involved in >>> an >>> > actual port. >>> > >>> > Best regards, >>> > >>> > Lane. >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>
