Hey Alex!

So I redeployed with the order that I have written down here and lo and behold, 
no more UIComponent error ...
Now I've got new errors but those are related to our own modules ;-)

Thanx for many helps! But man, this switch to 4.14.1 is a real PITA :D

Kr,
Filip

-----Original Message-----
From: L'Hommelet Filip [mailto:Filip.L'[email protected]] 
Sent: woensdag 3 juni 2015 8:41
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: AW: Deployed application: runtime: VerifyError: Error #1014: Class 
mx.core::UIComponent could not be found.

Hi Alex,

This is my output of a maven build:

Writing configuration dump to 
D:\I3G\git-workspaces\flex\wp-nato-47\testproject\target\testproject-1.0-configs.xml
Required RSLs:
    framework-swc/library.swf
    textLayout-swc/library.swf
    spark-swc/library.swf
    sparkskins-swc/library.swf
    charts-swc/library.swf
    mx-swc/library.swf
    advancedgrids-swc/library.swf
    core-swc/library.swf

trying to get an output from mxmlc but not sure which flag I need to set on the 
compiler.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: woensdag 3 juni 2015 8:16
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: AW: Deployed application: runtime: VerifyError: Error #1014: Class 
mx.core::UIComponent could not be found.



On 6/2/15, 10:58 PM, "L'Hommelet Filip"
<Filip.L'[email protected]> wrote:

>Hey Alex,
>
>I take it you received my dump-file? :-)
>
>This is how I have my dependencies ordered:

I don’t know enough about Maven to know if this is right or wrong.  I’m not 
sure if Chris is saying some Maven issue is affecting this as well.
In theory, the compiler should take this list of SWCs in any order and compute 
the right order in the list that goes in the SWF.  That’s what I saw in the 
dump.  

If you take my little test file and build it with Maven, do you also get 
AdvancedGrids and Charts before framework.swc?  If you have a non-Maven Flex 
SDK and use mxmlc to compile my little test file do you see the RSLs with 
framework.swc first?  That’s what I get.

-Alex

Reply via email to