Tom, you're right but this news is breaking in every tech/dev blog and people who is not in IT world will keep in mind only the bad part of this situation: "Flash is dangerous for your computer security"....
Probably firstly Adobe and everyone of us should publicize the responsive concept you said... a patch is already available ...with the same propagation speed as this really bad news is doing in the IT world today... Surely this breaking news is gold for every IT blogger and for the "no flash" part of the IT world...and the problem will be that we probably won't have a loud and firm response from Adobe to extinguish the fire this news fired up... Probably this is driven from some logic ( named world wide business) i don't really understand.... As a friend of mine mailed me telling about the security bug news..we should mail back to every mail like this, saying that what's happening to flash today is happening every days world wide for almost every IT product... but the great thing is that we have already a patch..because Adobe is responsive as every great company.... my two cents.... Angelo El mié., 15 jul. 2015 a las 11:08, Tom Chiverton (<[email protected]>) escribió: > On 15/07/15 09:14, Nigel Hillier wrote: > > Is there any point in continuing, if the security reputation is so poor > that > > users have almost no choice but to uninstall ( or run it only on > equipment > > disconnected from real life, surrounded by firewalls, moats, Doberman > dogs ) > > I don't think it's any worse than any other widely deployed product. > At least Adobe are responsive and have a fix out the day after Mozilla > jumped the gun and blocked the then-current version of the plugin. > > Tom >
