Hi Olaf, Maybe we should put your example as part of Flex Utilities with proper instruction. [1] Add there only those parts of Fontawesome where we don't have license issue. - This will just show that users can use it.
[1] https://github.com/apache/flex-utilities Thanks, Piotr 2018-02-20 19:17 GMT+01:00 Olaf Krueger <m...@olafkrueger.net>: > Thanks Om and Justin, > > after thinking about it a bit more and reading the license links I am not > sure if it is really a good idea to include FontAwesome5 by default within > the Flex SDK: > > - We increase the SDK size which is probably not the interest of all users > - We maybe ran into license issues > - We only can ship the free version of FontAwesome5 > - The usage of brand ions is unclear > - The usage of FontAwesome5 with Flex is pretty simple, even if it's not > part of the SDK > > If we still want to include it (in that way that we store the .*otf font > files in our repo) I think we are save regarding license issues when we > just > add a Readme to the project. > Flatspark just includes the SIL [1]. I am not sure if this is enough. > > What do you think? > > Thanks, > Olaf > > > [1] > https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/blob/master/ > frameworks/projects/flatspark/src/flatspark/assets/fonts/awesome/OFL.txt > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/ > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
