Am Samstag, 20. Januar 2007 16:16 schrieb Philipp Marek: > > The "fsvs status" after the sync-repos shows that fsvs incorrectly > > thinks that the working copy is in sync. > I'll take a look.
In fact, after a sync-repos on my "live" directory structure, fsvs 1.0.15 didn't show ANY file as changed, it only recognized (and transmitted) new files. That worked fine, however. > fsvs only stores the seconds, not micro- or nanoseconds, as most > filesystems don't have them anyway ... Yes, I know. As I said, if you know it, it's obvious, but if you hadn't thought about it before, it's confusing at first. > > Here, the working copy is recreated at the same place, with the same > > content. fsvs works correctly, but shows all file's meta-data to be > That'll be because of the ctime. That's discusseable, but on commit Ok. No, I just was curious, fsvs' behaviour was perfectly fine. Greetings, Gunter -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Some operating systems are called `user friendly', Linux however is `expert friendly'. -- gefunden in <news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + PGP-verschlüsselte Mails bevorzugt! + +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
pgpTNSNXWhhvk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
