Hello Simon!
> [HEAD]vm-one:/# fsvs sync-repos
> ...
> [HEAD]vm-one:/# fsvs st
> .m.? 0 ./var/lib/apt/lists/lock
> .m.? 6822306 ./var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin
> D... 0 ./usr/bin/htop
> D... 0 ./usr/share/man/man1/htop.1.gz
> D... dir ./usr/share/doc/htop
> D... 0 ./usr/share/doc/htop/AUTHORS
> D... 0 ./usr/share/doc/htop/changelog.gz
> D... 0 ./usr/share/doc/htop/changelog.Debian.gz
> D... 0 ./usr/share/doc/htop/copyright
> D... 0 ./usr/share/doc/htop/README
> D... 0 ./usr/share/pixmaps/htop.png
> D... 0 ./var/lib/dpkg/info/htop.postinst
> D... 0 ./var/lib/dpkg/info/htop.md5sums
> D... 0 ./usr/share/menu/htop
> .m.? 4096 ./var/lib/urandom/random-seed
> .m.? 218355 ./var/lib/dpkg/available-old
> .m.? 218355 ./var/lib/dpkg/available
> .m.? 0 ./var/lib/dpkg/info/htop.list
> .m.? 240354 ./var/lib/dpkg/status
> .m.? 0 ./var/lock/aptitude
> .m.? 240325 ./var/lib/dpkg/status-old
> ..C. dir ./usr/share/pixmaps
> .m.? 0 ./var/lib/dpkg/lock
> ..C. dir ./usr/share/menu
> ..C. dir ./usr/bin
> ..C. dir ./usr/share/man/man1
> .m.? 1668428 ./var/lib/aptitude/pkgstates.old
> .m.? 1668428 ./var/lib/aptitude/pkgstates
> .m.? 19463 ./var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated
> .m.? 4 ./var/lib/nfs/state
> .m.? 45 ./etc/resolv.conf
> .m.? 16 ./etc/network/run/ifstate
> D... 0 ./usr/share/applications/htop.desktop
> .m.? 349 ./etc/mtab
> ..C. dir ./usr/share/applications
> ..C. dir ./var/lib/dpkg/info
> ..C. dir ./usr/share/doc
> .m.? 0 ./root/.aptitude/config
> .m.? 0 ./lib/init/rw/.ramfs
> .m.. dir .
So, some changes here.
> [HEAD]vm-one:/# fsvs revert -R -C /
> Reverting to revision 5:
> .m.. 0 ./var/lib/apt/lists/lock
> .mC. 6822306 ./var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin
> D... 73252 ./usr/bin/htop
> D... 1707 ./usr/share/man/man1/htop.1.gz
>
> Warning [id=chown-other, action=stop]:
> Cannot chown "./usr/share/doc/htop" to 0:0
Hmmm .. I cannot check ATM, but it's possibly there's a bug related to
un-removing a directory.
I'll take a look, but that can take a few days until I find time.
> I am not sure, if I understood you correctly: Should the way I tried
> work? I would like that, because it means less work and that I don't
> need physical access to the machine that broke, once the minimal system
> is running :)
It should work, I just wanted to post an outline how it *could* work - ie.
how the recovery should be possible.
Regards,
Phil
--
Versioning your /etc, /home or even your whole installation?
Try fsvs (fsvs.tigris.org)!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
