-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 12 August 2008 16:18:25 Philipp Marek wrote: > Does anyone have some good ideas about specifying a mask for > permissions? I think we'll need two parts - an AND, and a CMP - or > possibly an XOR and an AND - or something along these lines.
This looks like a case of over exposure of unrequested generalisation. :-) The user story is: As a system administrator, I would like tell fsvs to encrypt or ignore world-readable files, so that I don't expose sensitive data in my backups. You're trying to produce a generalzed solution that solves more than this. That's sensible, but please don't lose sight of the original story. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIos8mpGJX8XSgas0RAvCZAJ4tLFzSJreXtVQKA6Jhg3MN/YJ89wCcD4tY FheO5vyk3vabid7VAXJDcik= =2P31 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
