Phil, My variant of the patch works fine for me, yes thanks :-)
Mark. P.Marek wrote: > Hello Mark! > > On Friday 22 May 2009 Mark J Hewitt wrote: > >> Well, my patch was slightly different (attached) but works, at least >> until I get: >> >> N... 0 mjh/.google/gadgets/ggl-host-socket >> 16:30:54.213 ci__nondir[commit.c:489] invalid/unknown file type 0140755 >> Segmentation fault >> > Well, yes; in that code path you possibly should initialize the returned mode > to S_IFREG or something similar. > > >> But back to FUSE for a moment... >> Note that you actually get an EACCES not an EPERM here. >> > Ok. > > >> I have a (probably bad) reputation for designing in too much >> flexibility, but I would have the user able to configure what they would >> want fsvs to do with each event, so a config file with a syntax like: >> >> permission_denied: log, continue >> >> etc., would cover all likely eventualities (!). >> > Some time ago I tried to get something like this running ... So that an > ordinary user can keep /etc versioned, and simply ignore all unreadable data. > But I abandoned that soon, because > - it was very intrusive, and > - there are too many things in /etc not readable by users, but which are > important for system operation and so should be kept. > > > If you put that line in, does it work for you? > > > Regards, > > Phil > > > ------------------------------------------------------ http://fsvs.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=3928&dsMessageId=2353201 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
