On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:40, Mark Stanton wrote: > Further to Fernando's post I'd like to add a thought. > > I hadn't noticed the project planning thing, but it seems to me that > (aside from that?) What LO misses, compared to M$Office, is an email > facility. > > I'd suggest that Virtual Access (www.virtual-access.org) would be a > good fit. It's a stable and very capable product, now an open source > application. > > Integration would, of course, be a job, but as an extremely capable > application in its own right it might/should be a better place to > start than from scratch?
And... according to the Virtual-Access website, it's a Windows-only application (win32) which makes it a very poor fit since it leaves out everyone who uses Linux and OSX. C. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
