Johnny Rosenberg wrote: > > > GetSystemTicks() > > Ah, ok. Thanks for the suggestion.
Johnny Rosenberg wrote: > > > Seems like one tick is one millisecond, at least on my system. The rest > is simple math. > > I suspect it's a little more complicated conversion between ticks and conventional time. I ran a few simple tests, and it looks like there's more to it than just 1 to 1 conversion. But for my application, system ticks should work fine. Thanks again. Regards -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/BASIC-Timer-function-only-has-resolution-of-1-second-tp2819804p2824316.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
