On 05/05/2011 08:08, Dotan Cohen wrote:
No matter who is at fault for the document incompatibility issue, Ubuntu is wrong in claiming that they ship software which is "fully compatible". You can see that a particular user is arguing that the claim is true, so it is important that users who can objectively state "I had a major compatibility issue" do so. This is not a technical issue, it is a change to the wording of the website. If you know Canonical, then you will know how important your mention of this issue is on that bug.
The problem is that this is a document-SPECIFIC issue, not a general docx bug. Both Windows and Linux versions of LO 3.3.2 WILL open docx files. I generally have no problems here opening docx files in LO (bar occasional minor formatting problems). This particular file is not readable by ANY version of OO or LO because of the silly way the creators made it. What they did was to create a huge text box and insert all the images inside that text box. WHY they would think of doing that heaven only knows....
-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
