Tanstaafl wrote (10-06-11 17:26)
On 2011-06-10 11:17 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote (10-06-11 16:54)
If you go back and read the archives, you will plainly see that the only
reason given for the single download was because of limited disk space,
Are you really sure? I though build time, so plain CPU power& energy,
were an issue too. But I might be wrong (could ask devs of course..)
I'm sure, because I participated in the discussion...
What I see now is :
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:10:47 +0000
From: Michael Meeks <[email protected]>
[...]
One of the benefits of the combined installer is that we do not require
many gigabytes of duplicated pointlessness on -every- mirror site: as we
duplicate all of the code again and again and again for windows, 90%+ of
which is identical, but each time with ~10Mb of translation / help :-)
That is a nightare to build, copy, sign, up-load and manage.
[...]
I see 3.4.0 for Windows is 188 MB now. Do you remember how much it was
in December .. 440 MB.
Wow, great work from all the devs, full time (paid) and part time
volunteers, that helped with this!
But on the other hand, and I guess that's what the discussion started
with, having to do a separate download for the help, if you want it
local, is not so convenient.
Regards,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to [email protected]
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
