David B Teague sr wrote: > On 7/17/2011 3:23 PM, Andy Brown wrote: >> Luuk wrote: >>> http://www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/buzz.nsf/web_DisPlayPlugin?open&unid=955E9C0EC712EC47852578CD0063A209&category=announcements >>> >>> >>> Is it time for the LO-developers to get back with OpenOffice too ? >>> >> In a word, no. >> >> >> > I agree, but I'd like to hear your reasons why "no"... > --David >
Why would LibreOffice what to go backwards? The last time that OOo code was introduced into the LO code there were big parts that had to be redone. LO already has features that OOo does not have. The way it stands those features will not make it into OOo/AOOo unless the developers donate the code needed directly to AOOo. With the current licensing setup LO code can not be used in AOOo, though LO is free to use any and all code from AOOo. Seems quite simple to me. Andy -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] In case of problems unsubscribing, write to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
