In news:[email protected],
Simon Cropper <[email protected]> typed:
> On 12/08/11 14:38, planas wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 13:52 +1000, Simon Cropper wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I have been doing some follow-up investigations that I
>>> thought you might like to be made aware.
>>>
>>> First, why? Well after testing the file that I
>>> recreated by copying the text, formula and styles I
>>> could not cause the error to occur again. This is what
>>> I reported yesterday. I then proceeded with importing
>>> the few images and 'artwork' objects from the old file
>>> to the new. After several saves and sheet manipulations
>>> I noticed the file became unstable again. The outcome of my 
>>> investigation was that one of the
>>> image files used on one of the sheets had become
>>> corrupted* and adding this file in caused the file to
>>> become unstable - eventually exhibiting the problem I
>>> mentioned about not being able to save after a sheet
>>> was deleted. These 'corrupted' files are relatively
>>> benign with the error only becoming apparent *once* you
>>> attempt to delete the sheet. So somehow the error
>>> caused problems with the broader 'workbook' structure
>>> not the sheet structure. Although I compared files
>>> between different versions of the file the XML were too
>>> varied (usually style names and definitions; content
>>> was identical).   * note I say corrupted but it rendered OK and only
>>>      resulted in the observed behaviour one a sheet is
>>>      deleted. I 'deem' it corrupted as once replaced
>>>      with a clean version render and saved as a new
>>> file by GIMP, the problem disappeared. The error was with the particular 
>>> corrupt objects. On
>>> recreating new images and inserting them into a file I
>>> have not been able to trigger any problems. If I
>>> cut-and-paste from the original 'corrupt' file the file
>>> becomes unstable after a few saves and sheet
>>> manipulations.  So the steps for salvage is...
>>> 1. recreate a new file with the exact number of sheets
>>> as the original. Ensure each sheet names are the same.
>>> 2. Cut and Paste each sheet. Make sure you 'Paste
>>> special' limiting the content being placed in the new
>>> file to text, numbers, date&  time, formulas and
>>> formats. 3. If you have images in the file. Recreate / Save
>>> using another package. As mentioned I used GIMP.
>>> 4. Insert new copies of the images into file. *Don't*
>>> cut-and-paste objects from the old file.
>>> 5. If you have any lines, text boxes and artwork;
>>> recreate them from new. During this process...
>>> - Save as a new version (+tabs, +data, +images, +other
>>> objects) following each step.
>>> - Test each version thoroughly before proceeding.
>>> - Only add one object at a time, so if something goes
>>> wrong you can isolate the problem component.
>>> - To check it is not a bug try and recreate with a
>>> fresh file. A couple of quick notes that may be valuable to
>>> others... - ODS files are archives. Use an archive
>>> facility to extract the data inside. Inspect the
>>> contents in the folders to see what is different. - On
>>> every 'Save as' the file size changes. This is not due
>>> to changes in the file contents, but rather in changes
>>> in how the components of the file is
>>> compressed/archived. If you open a file, add objects
>>> then save, the file size with be so big. Open that file
>>> and "Save as" a new name and the file will be a
>>> different size. If you extract the files the contents
>>> of all the files and directories are identical. It is
>>> just the internal archive facility in LO will decide
>>> the best compaction routine based on what it
>>> encounters. - The content.xml file can be quite large
>>> and has no internal end-of-line characters. This make
>>> it difficult to open and be parse by various text
>>> editors, xml viewers and comparison facilities. To
>>> insert a EOL character after the end of each tag
>>> (i.e.>), I used the following command in the terminal
>>> (requires Linux).     cat content.xml | sed -e 's/>/>\n/g'> 
>>> content_with_linebreaks.xml cat just spews the content of the text file 
>>> to the
>>>      standard output. I then pipe it to sed, where I
>>>      used regular expressions to find '>' and replace
>>>      every instance of it with '>\n'. I then compared
>>> the contents with Diffuse.
>>
>> Snip
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I wonder how the images got corrupted, interesting.
>
> Good question and something I was not happy just leaving
> alone.
> Once I satisfied myself that this was most likely not a
> bug but file corruption the questions that came to mind
> were... (1) How this file became corrupted? and
> (2) How extensive is the damage (physical damage, system
> wide, file specific)?
>
> As mentioned I currently use Linux so needed to find a
> method to check the file system for errors and see if any
> blocks or clusters were damaged. I am assuming here that
> I could of had a power spike or jolt to my machine that
> could of caused the platter on my hard disk becoming
> damaged.
> I did this by running 'fsck.ext4' from a LiveCD on all my
> hard disks. It took all Saturday to do this. Thankfully
> no errors were detected. Anyone interested in how I did
> this can check out my more specific response on the
> Ubuntu Forums...
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=11152491#post11152491
>
> This left me with an event that could have occurred while
> the affected file was open that could have resulted in
> the identified corruption. In fact, on reflection I did
> have a power blackout 3-weeks ago! I know pretty much
> exactly when it occurred and so was able to work out
> exactly what I was doing... as it turns out I was editing
> the exact sheet in the corrupted file that contained the
> corrupted image!
> As LO had 'recovered' the file; all text, formula and
> images were present and encountered for; and rendering as expected, I
> never even thought the file was damaged; so much so that
> 2-weeks later when peculiar 'sheet/tab deletion errors' appeared I did not
> even connect the two events (power outage and corruption).
>
> Thanks everyone for your help - I appreciate your efforts
> and suggestions.
> --
> Cheers Simon
>
>    Simon Cropper
>    Principal Consultant
>    Botanicus Australia Pty Ltd
>    PO Box 160, Sunshine, VIC
>    W: www.botanicusaustralia.com.au

What does "could of" mean in the context of your usage? It makes no sense. 
Could "have" would make sense, but several times you said "could of".




-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to