On 1 Sep 2011 at 13:25, David H. Lipman wrote: > I have analyzed obfuscated Javascripts and viewed deobfuscated > Javascripts that uses a laundry list of vulnerabilities and software > versions in the vulnerability/exploitation attack vector. >
What on earth has javascript to do with this issue? This is a JAVA issue. Any vulnerabilities in javascript only affect javascript, which is a totally different kettle of fish and doesn't even form part of LO. I remain puzzled by this thread. I have Java 1.6.0.26 installed and that works just fine with LO 3.4.3 on Windows XP SP3. The suggestion to deliberately install old potentially insecure versions of Java is very bad advice, not to mention the copyright infringements of hosting it on personal web space. Dave http://www.davesergeant.com -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
