On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 00:13, Nuno J. Silva <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, that's the issue. I don't know about the binary formats, but I've > read that Microsoft does not actually *follow* OOXML. (This, if true, > means, ironically, that there is no program with complete, 100%, OOXML > support.) Maybe it was just a hoax, but I doubt it. After all, it's > Microsoft. > > With Microsoft stardards, either someone steps forward and spends their > time working out how to convert between MS formats and ODF, which will > take a *lot* of time (and will not address the implementation > deviations), or people flag issues and devs will address compatibility > issue by issue. > > So, people with compatiblity issues, please report these issues. >
One team at MS works on MS Office, another on the OOXML standard. This is required to be considered for a standard. Much how LO is written by a group of programmers, and the ODF standard by engineers. LO does not implement the ODF standard 100% either. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
