Hi :) I really like that idea a lot but i have been told it's unfeasable. Even if we could clearly identify that 20% it would be tricky to slim the apps down that way. Regards from Tom :)
--- On Sat, 17/9/11, David B Teague sr <[email protected]> wrote: From: David B Teague sr <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: docx format troubles To: [email protected] Date: Saturday, 17 September, 2011, 13:30 On 9/16/2011 6:56 AM, Tom Davies wrote: > If you were able to ring-fence about 20% of the features of MS Office then > about 80% of users never stray outside that. From what i see it's more like > about 100% of users. Most users don't even use all of that 20%. I hope this isn't hijacking the thread, and if so, /please /say so, and I'll repost this in a new thread. The fact that 20% of the features of MS Office (and by implication, LO and OO.o) used almost exclusively by some 80% of the users suggests to me that OO.o should identify that 20% of features and modularize OO.o or LO or what have you to include that 20% and make the other 80% of the features available as extensions. I'd like comments on this idea. David Teague -- nil significat nisi oscillat -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
