On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 17:29 -0700, gomadtroll wrote: > I use GNU Linux Debian and LO is the same code & many developers as the > previous OO that was released with this distro. > > That said , the LO devs are doing a lot of work on the code, cleanups, their > words, and I have noticed some 'enhancements' in LO 3.4.3. > > LO ver 3.3.4 looks & acts the same as my previous ver, OO 3.2.1, for my use. > The enhancement to how Tables line styles is configured has changed, and it > is not rendering double lines the same as ver 3.3.4 and previous OO > versions.. If your documents, the archived ones, have tables, they won't be > readable with LO ver 3.4.3. There are bug(s) filed against this issue, > something like #38542. > > I would say LO ver 3.3.4 is a replacement for all previous versions of OO > and in time LO version 3.4.x will be even better. No need to run multiple > versions. >
I think the idea is to have on version a little more bleeding edge and one version that is stable. The stable version is for those who can not tolerate a slightly quirky version of LO, particularly in business. > -- > View this message in context: > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Dead-End-or-Evolution-tp3352009p3357342.html > Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
