Hi :) That seems to list all the supported versions/distros of Windows but doesn't included unsupported ones such as Win98. Does that mean Win98 is safe or just that they don't bother to look to see if it's vulnerable?
Tbh my interest suddenly dropped away when i found that LO is safe even if we read a doc file in it and creating doc files is still safe too in LO. I'm a little worried about the works machines especially after the work i have put in these last 2 weeks but if they suffer because of using MS Office then it might encourage them to move to LO and that would be fine by me. The problem would be if the machines got infected right after me working on updating everything and installing weird stuff such as LO. If LO prevents the machine itself getting infected that is one good thing but if it inadvertently passes infections on then the wrong people, ie LO users, might start getting the blame for something that is not their/our fault. Of course they/we would also be passing it on if we were using MS Office but at least we would have had more warning about it as our machines got infected. Hmmm, this whole lack of security in MS products really creates a lot of weird blame issues. Regards from Tom :) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/MS-font-exploit-tp3481492p3483006.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
