On 11/18/2011 09:13 AM, Martin Jungowski wrote:
Pedro, thank you. The problem is that as an enterprise that sees IT as
tertiary means of production (as opposed to technology-driven
enterprises such as Google or Microsoft) we're extremely conservative
when it comes to software. The latest and greatest is never our first
choice, and features are a distant fourth to stability, reliability,
and dependability. Right now I'm leaning towards the well-established
and therefore more stable 3.3 release tomsave myself the hassle of new
features and thus also new bugs.
Is there a simple comparison between 3.3 and 3.4 that shows what 3.4
is capable of that 3.3 isn't? Maybe there's something we really need
but don't know yet. Something that'd be worth the extra work and
effort necessary to deploy 3.4 instead of 3.3? Right now it's more
like a clusterf*ck of two separate feature sets with no easy way of
comparison.
Thanks,
Martin
3.4.X is better at handling MSO msox formats than 3.3.X. Because
external users may send say a docx or xslx file to your users I
recommend using 3.4.3/4. Both are lines are considered ready for
enterprise users - 3.4.X since 3.4.3.
--
Jay Lozier [email protected]
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
