What I do not like is when people tell others that if the files do not
come from their source, then they must [or implied that way] have
something "nasty" hidden inside.
There are many places where you can find "clean" copies of LibreOffice.
There are many people out there who are doing their best to create
different ways to distribute LibreOffice to their region of the world.
I am just one of them.
Over the years to come, there will be many new ways for people to get
the latest and greatest open-source software. These ways may exist now,
or are yet to be developed. One way would be from magazine DVDs or
other offers like that. Then there will be cloud systems that are
offering LO for use. All these new ways to get access to LO will not be
through the current "Official LibreOffice website". So if you have the
view that if you do not get it from the LO site, for windows, and the
repositories for Linux, are we to just tell people that they should not
use all these new ways to get or use LO since they are not from either
of his/hers "approved" sources?
Sure, some places I would not want to download from. I use WOT [Web of
Trust] Google filter on my browser to help stay away from those sites.
As always, you should run any downloads through your security software
to make sure that there is no nasties within them. But, I do not say
that you have to avoid going to other sites or distribution methods if
you want to get unmodified copies of LibreOffice.
On 12/22/2011 10:41 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
True that the code is unmodified in the North American Dvd project (and other Dvd projects). Typically, as i understand it, they tend to bundle a bunch of useful programs and useful extras (better dictionaries, artwork, templates, Extensions etc) that people can choose to use (or not use) in addition to the main program supplied in/on the Dvd.
Personally i think all those Dvd projects should be hosted on TDF and LibreOffice servers in addition to other places if possible. While they aren't, there is an element of suspicion for people that are not familiar with the personalities involved. Those of us that do know you have good reason to trust you. My understanding is that the Dvd projects are there mainly for people to make Dvds in bulk in order to sell or distribute at events and such rather than being for the general public.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Thu, 22/12/11, webmaster for Kracked Press
Productions<webmas...@krackedpress.com> wrote:
From: webmaster for Kracked Press Productions<webmas...@krackedpress.com>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Question Concerning your product
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Thursday, 22 December, 2011, 15:20
On 12/22/2011 03:06 AM, doug wrote:
On 12/21/2011 08:08 PM, Mike Watson wrote:
I am considering downloading your product to avoid having to buy Microsoft
Office. But I have a question about your product. On your Features page you
said that the LGPL public license could be hacked by the user. What does that
mean? Does it mean that anyone can hack it? Please reply whenever you can.
Thank you for your time.
I believe that what you're seeing is the fact that LO is "open source," which
means that the code is
available to anyone who wants it, and therefore can be modified--"hacked," if
you will--by anyone
sufficiently savvy to do so. It does NOT mean that the program you download
and install in your
system has been modified or hacked, so long as you get it thru the LibreOffice
website or thru your
Linux distribution's repository. But if someone wants to put in some extra
feature, and is smart
enough to do so, he can, unlike with the Microsoft product, whose code is kept
highly secret.
HTH--doug
I take it you do not think that the version[s] of LibreOffice on the
LibreOffice-NA.US<http://libreoffice-na.us/> site [and other project sites]
are an unmodified versions of LO?
These DVD projects, like the -NA.us one, do not modify LO, but they present LO towards a specific
community group. There are several projects out there, some with links on the LO web pages. They
do not have the range of install files that LO's "official" site has, but that does not
mean they are "hacks" of LO.
LibreOffice-NA.US<http://libreoffice-na.us/>, has produced a DVD versions for
distribution of LO and all the extras that a user might want with their LO install.
Documentation, dictionaries and other extensions, templates, artwork, etc., etc., all
in one place or on the DVD media so the user does not have to go searching different
places for them. Some of the extras are not conveniently accessible on the LO web
pages for the users to find, since they are not found on LO's sites.
There are other projects in other languages, for DVD and other access to LO's files.
They may or may not have their project "officially" listed on one of LO's web
pages. I know for a fact that there is a guy in Malta that is creating a distribution
DVD for his native language, which is not listed in the LO pages.
SO, please do not imply that if you get your copy of LO from places other than
LO's download page or the Linux repository, it would be an unofficially
modified version of LO. That is not true for all cases. Many people are just
presenting LO differently in a different way, without modifying the install
files.
-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
