anthropornis <[email protected]> writes: > I am curious, which, if any, word processing programs (not text > editors) actually have an Emacs "mode"?
Oh I would like to know that, too :) > Compared to the broader base of non-techie word processor users, > making a word processor behave like Emacs would be extraordinarily > niche oriented. To me, there´s quite a difference between "make application A (behave) like application B" and "be able to define (some frequently used) key bindings in application A to be the same ones as in application B for the same functionality". Do you want, for example, your MUA behave like the spreadsheet in LO --- or would you rather have the same key binding in your MUA and in your spreadsheet for saving your work? The latter isn´t a new idea. And isn´t LO "extraordinarily niche orientated" in beeing programmable with it´s own programming language --- or is it more like emacs in that regard than people happen to notice? > Why don't you just actually write documents in Emacs and do some LaTex > or similar formatting like some other Emacs users do? It´s because I´m not sufficiently familiar with LaTeX to always get the result I want with LaTeX with the same amount of effort I can get the result with LO. It has been the other way round as well. It´s only a matter of chosing the right tool for the job --- and if I could adjust the key bindings in LO to what I use in emacs, I could make the job even easier for me. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
